Not that I'm a believer, quite the opposite. I still think that getting both sides of the story will create a better understanding of people that are religious and those that are not, and to understand from the very beginning of our lives that people make these kind of choices for themselves. Denying access to either one forces a choice upon us and labels people unnecessarily.
I know some high schools probably offer philosophy and comparitive religious classes, and you will find that I will not argue with intelligent design being taught there, for that is where it belongs. The theory of intelligent design relies on such broad, weak, and unscientific evidence that it has no place in science classes.
The people who came up with the "theory of intelligent design" and then tried to pass it off as a science, are not scientists, even if they did hold phds in scientific fields. A better label for them would be philosophers and religious scholars, since they think outside the view of most mainstream scientists, who generally don't consider the mysteries of god to be of very high importance, unlike philosophers and religious people, who do.
Jeremy
