Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page

PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)

'Umm, I disagree with that, somewhat.' posted by The Red i - 21/12/2005, 03:11:46 'an English perspective' posted by Laitainion - 21/12/2005, 09:08:31 'i had RE classes in both primary and secondary school' posted by Aishae of sentience - 21/12/2005, 13:18:34

CURRENT MESSAGE

Hrm... previously posted: we had sex ed. in RE classes for some reason! I think they put sex ed in the RE classes because religions usually put rules on sex. (When it's appropriate, where, with whom, etc.) When I was in high school (a Baptist private school), the Bible teacher and the science teacher got together and coordinated teaching schedules so we'd get both lectures on sex at the same time, the physical side in science class and the spiritual side in Bible class. "Stupidity is no excuse!"

AUTHOR OF THIS MESSAGE Admiral Memo MESSAGE TIMESTAMP 22 december 2005, 06:16:50 AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED 63.27.94.119

REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

Was that the given name for the lesson or just what familiarly you called it? - Miguel - 22/12/2005, 18:33:59 It was the given name. - Admiral Memo - 22/12/2005, 23:28:54 Now I believe you ab - Liliana - 16/12/2014, 18:48:31 So what? - EofS - 23/12/2005, 00:03:40 ... 13I'd rather tax - Munyanya - 16/12/2014, 10:49:34 Well, it wasn't like other religions were excluded... - Admiral Memo - 23/12/2005, 04:13:31 really have got to d - Mikael - 19/12/2014, 05:48:32 My dad, my stepfathe - Raj - 16/12/2014, 15:06:08

REPLY FORM

name: email: title: message: Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:   sign post using your signature    |      no text

Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 611 time(s).