Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'I didn't see those...' posted by The Lone Ensign - 04/09/2005, 10:54:06
'E did a little experiment earlier, but that's lost now....' posted by Nemi - 04/09/2005, 13:21:04
'I'm wondering...' posted by The Amnesiac One - 04/09/2005, 13:56:30

CURRENT MESSAGE

Ah, but...
The other point of my experiment was to show how an unthreaded board is incompatible for a forum where we go off at tangents.

Take this thread for example. Say I'm interested in Josh's original question, but don't care at all about Nemi and Aaron's discussion. I would have to keep opening the thread when there was a new post because I don't know if it's responding to Nemi/Aaron or the original post. With a tree format you can ignore subthreads you're not interested in. Which is why it's common (in my experience) in busy phpbb forums to be very strict about staying "on-topic" and if the SB ever started doing that... I would probably leave. Because the anarchic attitude to being on-topic is one of the reasons I've always loved the SB.

And on a purely practical level, I've never used a phpbb/ubb forum that actually *correctly* jumped you to the latest post you've not read. Scrolling up to find out when you were last there is bloody irritating.

Plus you end up with pagination of replies, which means clicking back and forth and scrolling up and down.





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
EofS

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
05 september 2005, 04:40:22

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
193.35.8.232




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

blank
This is the perfect  - Anita - 19/12/2014, 23:40:58terminator
blank
Hello.Originally pos - Matos - 16/12/2014, 18:05:22terminator


REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 913 time(s).