Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'nope - you haven't a leg to stand on this time' posted by Little green man - 25/01/2006, 04:54:26
'But... *the defense lawyer stands up*' posted by Admiral Memo - 25/01/2006, 06:47:43
'*Rises arbiter* He however did mention...' posted by The Huff - 26/01/2006, 08:31:32

CURRENT MESSAGE

to include <a href="
to include prnodiivg advice on a question of law other than that of India - such 'law' is not law within the India and is dealt with as such under the Evidence Act.To argue that the practice of law does not include non-litigation is foolish given both common sense and the judicial precedents ; but to hold that practise of EU law (for instance)is also regulated by the Advocates Act, more so. Unlike many other countries the practise of foreign law is not regulated at all in India and in the absence of any such regulation, trying to bring it under the ambit of the Advocates Act is a bridge too far.In summary, many of the arguments raised by the respondents were weak and not well thaought of, but it was perhaps hasty on the part of the Bombay High Court in going overboard to find a reason to shut down White & Case.





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Sousou

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
19 december 2014, 03:54:31

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
183.228.41.244




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 247 time(s).