Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'Agreed! My preferred method as well' posted by jordi - 23/04/2008, 17:00:53
'I hate CAPTCHAs. Failed three times!! (NT)' posted by jordi - 23/04/2008, 17:01:22
'But CAPTCHAs love you! (N/T)' posted by Soicjuabba - 23/04/2008, 20:14:22

CURRENT MESSAGE

Javascript methods h
Javascript methods have the diatvdanasge of potentially preventing non-javascript users (like those running NoScript) from being able to post. OK, so you might only have one spam get through, but how many did you block and how many legitimate comments got stopped too?We monitor all the comments on our site with no captcha and no javascript validation, and the most successful prevention by far is a honeypot trap.It's simply a field with a common name (e.g. 'comments') whose only purpose is for spambots to fill out. It's labelled with "Do not fill out this field" and hidden with CSS, but to the spambot it's just another junk receptacle. Naturally any form submission with anything in this field is put aside to be manually checked.Potentially there are a couple of issues with this approach:1) Any 'autofill' browser functionality could trigger this trap, however we've found that autofill rarely applies to textareas and not to 'comments' fields.2) It's trivial for anyone specifically targetting your site to circumvent this measure. At that point you have to start thinking about CAPTCHAs and the like, but I can't imagine most sites on the internet are open to that level of attack.However, we've had zero false positives in our case, and provably no legitimate comments have been blocked





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Daiane

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
19 december 2014, 23:54:18

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
190.39.73.90




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 177 time(s).