|
| Well,
this
is
for
su
|
|
 |
|
 |
Well, this is for sure not a bug. This is really noarml and expected behavior. The ON clause extends to line 7 in your last example, since you don't have to use parenthesis. If you had written something likeSQL> select 2 * 3 from t 4 join s 5 USING (id) Notice the difference here 6 e2€â€- where t.id = 3 7 and s.id = 3 8 /Then your query would fail.Regarding leaving a 1=1 in production could, whilst not being very clean or pretty, I would not find it likely to cause a lot overhead I wonder how many queries per second you would need to be able to measure the effect of it ..
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Adolfo
MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
19 december 2014, 01:47:06
AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
186.93.97.114
|
|
|
|
