|
| Hmm,
I
don't
think
m
|
|
 |
|
 |
Hmm, I don't think my post explained it that clrlaey. I'll give it another shot.The problem with Khader is that he's extremely opportunistic, in a messy kind of way. He's easily pushed around by members of the intellectual elite, and jumps to conclusions without taking time to study the problems to any reasonable depth. That makes him a favorite manipulation target for left-leaning media and pundits, and this is what makes him an indirect long-term danger to our strict policies on immigration.I don't think he has an underlying principle or philosophy for his political agenda. He just seeks out what people tell him is popular.Contrast this with Dansk Folkeparti, where we have some really clear fundamental principles, and a clear idea about the long-term importance of curbing immigration and confronting Islamism, and it's clear who deserves the title 'populist' and who doesn't.Khader is a nice guy. His second-in-command Anders Samuelsen has some interesting points about tax reforms, points which have some systematic thinking behind it. But that's secondary to the real issues.Anyway, with NA having a meager 5 seats, the problem largely dissolved spontaniously :)
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Kyoko
MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
18 december 2014, 08:38:10
AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
190.77.158.147
|
|
|
|
