Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page

PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)

'what? isn't that a bit inefficient?' posted by The Red i - 16/11/2005, 01:06:31 'Not really.' posted by Leander - 16/11/2005, 09:08:11 'And if you let parents teach, anyone can afford a license.' posted by Sessy - 16/11/2005, 12:55:02

CURRENT MESSAGE

Thanks, deBeauxOs. M Thanks, deBeauxOs. Must have been a pretty amzaing comment you wrote! :)Mike writes, "whether one considers a fetus a "person" or not is irrelevant. No "person" may exist by non-consensually living at the expense of, and off of the life of, another."Tell that to fathers who are forced to pay for child support to kids they never see. How about elderly parents who need material and emotional care from their unwilling children? What about young mothers who realize too late that they cannot care for their newborn? I guess we're justified in "aborting" all of them, too, since it is irrelevant if they are "persons" or not.I'm sure that's not what you meant, Mike. I just sense some ethical contortions being made.

(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME Khan MESSAGE TIMESTAMP 16 december 2014, 19:39:02 AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED 62.210.78.179

REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -

REPLY FORM

name: email: title: message: Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:   sign post using your signature    |      no text

Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 194 time(s).