Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'Don't do that!' posted by EofS - 19/01/2009, 08:35:52
'Muahahahahahahah. (N/T)' posted by Evil Muffy - 19/01/2009, 09:46:19
'Everyone, get back inside, I'll handle this.' posted by NovaFlash - 20/01/2009, 10:27:47

CURRENT MESSAGE

This is not an artic
This is not an article to end till the other dsoceiin from the court or the parlament till the sun film users get relief.Think once how the Diana met and accident ? Just by being hunted by the press reporters when they saw her in the car.This SC order is no way reasonable and is a great threat to the woman privacy and security.Infact many people do not want to get disturbed by the gustures or being peeped out by others. Drunkards even may follow you when they need the money. what about the photophobiac people then ? They fear of light than what they had been exposed to till now. More light than what they are accustomed would result in sick to them. What about the people who disagree with others interfering whith their private postures ? For example a Natrum sulph patient homeopathically does not want to be looked at while he is doing something else. Others gestures at you would definately effect your whole scenario of thought process. A review and cancellation of the order is blindly an essentiality to reduce more crimes.Banning black films would result in enormous increase in the rate of crimes of congnizable and uncongnizable than than what is explained in the verdict.we are supposed to respect the individual liberty , safety and security specially the woman .





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Kenta

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
19 december 2014, 12:09:00

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
112.45.179.93




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 209 time(s).