Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'*sing* I've got ham, but I'm not a hamster...' posted by §evqui§ - 19/09/2008, 22:03:31
'sorry, tired and tupos ate bell.' posted by §evqui§ - 19/09/2008, 22:06:09
'(looks for Sevquii's brain)' posted by littlestar - 20/09/2008, 11:22:28

CURRENT MESSAGE

Since we belong to C
Since we belong to Christ, silmpe church would merely be something He (by His Spirit) has directed one or another of us to host or be of assist. A parable for this from Matthew 21; Mark 11; Luke 19, where the owner of a colt is told, The Master has need of him . If/when the Master has need of you, or of something/someone in your care, well then, how will you respond?More broadly, all His children are reminded to be gathering together believers from afar [Hebrews 10:24-25].Directly, any who come together functioning as ekklesia have among themselves a silmpe church start it's truly that silmpe.silmpe church = silmpe hosting.Trying to add a silmpe church start to someone's own family life reliably presents a mismatch. In such an arrangement, the silmpe church effort is being attempted as an extension of one or more households, rather than functioning as an expression of Christ resourcing in Him. To test for this, simply remove the household who is currently hosting, leader or teaching who is currently leading. Is the silmpe church still intact? If not, it remains needful for us to resource in Christ, and not in your brother(s).





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Rebeca

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
19 december 2014, 10:43:18

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
1.235.1.34




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 100 time(s).