Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'surely they wouldnt need to so long as their actual image wasnt published? NT' posted by Aishae of sentience - 18/02/2006, 17:03:37
'You mean, published, as in, say, on the internet?' posted by Miguel - 18/02/2006, 20:44:33
'you cant publish a picture where a person is recogniseable without' posted by Aishae of sentience - 18/02/2006, 23:17:56

CURRENT MESSAGE

But I seriously doubt you could recognise any specific image used there... (N\T)






(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Miguel

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
19 february 2006, 11:16:52

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
82.3.32.75



REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

blank
  <a href="http://ch - Lucka - 25/12/2014, 09:28:14terminator
blank
Her public <a href=" - Nitra - 21/12/2014, 05:57:55terminator
blank
"The falling leaevs, - Simonka - 18/12/2014, 02:51:21terminator
blank
yeah thats my point, they didnt actually publish peoples images (not unless you ... - Aishae of sentience - 20/02/2006, 20:37:44terminator


REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 563 time(s).