|
| That
seems
roughly
f
|
|
 |
|
 |
That seems roughly fair, athlough that laughter is corrective is disputable (and the ironic distance between what we say and what we do shares a pathos (bathos) with Nietzsche's view on laughter). I think I've probably attempted a catch-all that is lacking in a disciplined use of language. I suppose I was curious as to how a conflict can exist between the expected and its counterpoint (the theory of humour that suggests a double narrative: the story that appears to be and the story that is revealed to be), that this conflict can create the powerful emotions of fear and relief, and how this squares with the anodyne nature of most communication between close social groups.Secondly in this post I've ignored this paradox completely and just mused about the tensions of what I would believe to be a genuine comedy sharing something with the tensions of creation. Specifically that the process of creation must take into account a multiple narrative within each stroke in order that we are not just tracing. On reflection that sounds blandly symbolistic but I would prefer it to be read at the specific level of actuating a thought.And I should add that you're right, these people ain't funny, but it doesn't stop them laughing. Curious.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Raymond
MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
18 december 2014, 08:24:27
AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179
|
|
|
|
