|
我真的佩æœé€™äº›å
šå®¢
å› ç‚ºé€™äº›åšå®¢
您å¯ä»¥
|
|
 |
|
 |
我真的佩æœé€™äº›åšå®¢ å› ç‚ºé€™äº›åšå®¢ 您å¯ä»¥åˆ†äº«ä¸€äº›å®ƒå€‘çš„éˆæŽ¥å—Ž æˆ‘æƒ³æœ‰èˆˆè¶£çš„äººæœƒæƒ³è®€è®€é€™äº›æ–‡ç« P.S. 最大的輸家 是在與奧巴馬å°è©±ç¾å ´ç«¯å著的數百來自八所上海大å¸çš„年輕人 å¯èƒ½å¯«é‡äº†æ‰‹å§ Yes, they are not randomly seelcted students. Yes, they are heavily screened. Yes, there are reports they went through days (4 days?) of "training" to make sure they don't do or say the "wrong" things".But as long as these students were not drugged, their ears are not plugged, and they understand English, then they had a chance to listen to Obama unfiltered. Not many Chinese can listen to the speech live. And not many Chinese could listen to the full speech.Obama is not always right but he bought up a few interesting points for the Chinese students to think about. I listened to Obama's session (that same day from the Whitehouse website) and I think he delivered a reasonably good speech and a nice Q&A (note the online question re Chinese firewall seelcted by the US press).錢鋼è€å¸«å¯«"最大的輸家". As I argued above, may be that is a rather pessimistic view of things.Of courses, if all of the "students" were actually undercover Chinese police on the job pretending to be "students", then may be that session would have be a total waste of time. :)Wow, this is looooong. I need to repost this in my blog. :)
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Ruslan
MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
18 december 2014, 02:07:45
AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179
|
|
|
|
