Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'Apparently Patrick Stewart gets knighted next Wednesday...' posted by Little green man - 01/06/2010, 19:06:49
'In my feed reader the BBC were headlining this "Make it Sir!" *grin* (N/T)' posted by admin - 03/06/2010, 04:35:25
'heh, so long as he's not 'beknighted'... which is something else entirely :+P (N/T)' posted by Little green man - 04/06/2010, 17:15:07

CURRENT MESSAGE

He's not beknighted
He's not beknighted and he does know betetr. I've no doubt his apologia for paedophilia was written with full malice aforethought.When dealing with paedophiles it pays to take the America expression 'If you've got the name, you may as well have the game' and turn it on its head. Thus: If you've got the game, you may as well have the name.If someone is pushing a paedophile barrow then they are, ipso facto, a paedophile barrow pusher. And who would be such a thing? Apart from a paedophile?You yourself must know how big this thing is. It's centred in certain crucial establishments. They are: orphanages, churches, schools and child-minding centres; the executive, the judiciary, the military, and the police force; and last, but certainly not least, those definers of reality, the media.Upon meeting one of the above their involvement with the pedophocracy should be considered in terms of 'as likely as any other thing'. And should they express a pro-paedophile view, or otherwise pooh-pooh the whole thing and say it ain't so, then... well, I don't know about you, but me, I'd take it as read.Otherwise best regards and keep up the good work.





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Pedro

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
17 december 2014, 05:38:16

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 238 time(s).