|
| Michael
LewWouldn't
|
|
 |
|
 |
Michael LewWouldn't the likelihood fonuticn showing the probability of the probability of the observation as a continuous fonuticn of the effect size be the best way to assess the evidence in this case? Dividing the conceptual responses to the data into P0.05: we cannot exclude the possibility that vouchers fail to work' seems to me to be particularly unhelpful, as you no doubt agree. Severity analysis may provide something better than that, it seems to be doing so by providing something like a likelihood fonuticn. If that is the case, then why not go with a likelihood fonuticn?
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Lucas
MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 22:38:42
AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179
|
|
|
|
