Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'What an outrage!' posted by Symo - 26/11/2008, 18:37:50
'I was making myself understood to the US-ians' posted by Little green man - 26/11/2008, 22:48:29
'Theres an official male term for that colour:' posted by Symo - 27/11/2008, 15:03:02

CURRENT MESSAGE

Vesa KanninenNove
Vesa KanninenNovember 2, 2011Do you se any room for procedural imusrtnents , e.g. administrative processes that create accessibility-related procedures (like structured cooperation between transport planning, school authorities and infrastructure services to link information to create school network additions in a way that minimizes travel times for small children, or provides most opportunities for choosing high schools within a city-region)? I admit it's not in the core of the imusrtnents Naturally, there must be a type 1 and 2 (as listed above) imusrtnents inside the process with which data is collected and separate data are combined into accessibility information. However, I feel that often it's not the method but the process that makes the difference, since the process is the means to get to the data being gathered and the (often ad hoc) method being applied. Thus, I'm inclined to speak about procedural imusrtnents . Any thoughts on this?





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Den

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 20:16:36

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
186.92.86.93




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 217 time(s).