|
|
October
25,
2011I
|
|
 |
|
 |
October 25, 2011I agree with your idea of more elaboration as a sceond type of glossary. This one is to get on one line on what we all think are the main elements of the Action (e.g. accessibility and instruments). In e-mails and meetings these terms seem to have a wide range of understandings and we need to get a common denominator to keep the Action moving forward. Could you then respond to the terms here (or propose new ones) with a common denominator view? With the note that more nuance will come in a later stage?
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Jang
MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 19:55:53
AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179
|
|
|
|
