|
| Plus
that
it's
easil
|
|
 |
|
 |
Plus that it's easily one of the most ugly caaemrs that I've ever seen :)No, honestly, I guess this is a killer camera for many photographers and I expect it to be spectacularly successful. I predict at least a three stop advantage, thus it should be significantly better in low light than the LX5, and that even at the long end.On the other hand, I got a PEN E-P2 with superb electronic viewfinder, a 17/2.8 pancake lens and a spare battery used for only 550 . I could even have got an E-PL1 for much less. With an adapter I can use all my Nikon lenses, and some of them are extremely fast. Between those two caaemrs I still see an advantage for the Canon sensor (after all, sensors are an area where Canon is extremely good), but the advantage dwindles with faster lenses. I used my 50/1.2 last night and I could shoot at ISO 200 handheld. Sometimes I even had to stop down :)I think it all boils down to the question whether someone wants a fixed lens solution or is willing to carry and change lenses. The market is clearly there, but personally I am not attracted at all.
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Joao
MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 16:56:40
AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179
|
|
|
|
