Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'That has nothing to do with his award.' posted by Robwood - 11/10/2009, 04:15:30
'He's stopped the world despising America.  That's no small thing (N/T)' posted by admin - 11/10/2009, 05:43:00
'Hear hear.' posted by Selma - 11/10/2009, 08:29:46

CURRENT MESSAGE

Well, I think the fi
Well, I think the first thing we have to realize is that Liberalism could be clissifaed as a mental disorder, albeit one that is learned instead of caused by a malignancy. There are many cases where once a Liberal is hit with facts, truth and logic that they simply cannot refute they ultimately break from that fantasy world and move back to reality. The manner in which this manifests itself could be analogized as a parent/child dynamic. Conservatives are often called the party of “No”. That’s often true, at times you have to be told No. “Can I have some candy?” No, you’ll spoil your appetite. Now go wash your hands for supper. In all aspects of life there has to be boundaries, that’s unavoidable. But the child often disregards the boundaries, even when it’s for their own good. “I want to do drugs”, um, No that’s bad. Liberalism is the philosophy of the child. “I want, therefore I get it. What do you mean I have to pay for it? My parents do that, other people do that, not me.” Any time you actually attempt at logical discourse you get the result of a child: tantrums, name-calling, twisted and inane “logic”, and often the refrain of “I hate you!”. This also leads to secondary issues. First is the fantasy world that’s created: Global warming exists, tax cuts harm the poor, Democrats were always for civil rights & never oppressed anyone, standing up for your own rights therefore means a war on [Fill in here]. Attempts at “intruding” on that fantasy world often get the reaction of a child: tantrums, name-calling, twisted and inane “logic”, and often the refrain of “I hate you!”Next is the projection. The “child” develops reasoning through emotion, not logic and fact. “I feel I should have a cookie, therefore it’s true. I didn’t get the cookie, therefore it’s unfair!” You then get that “bad man” absolutism, where if you’re not with me you’re automatically against me and you’re automatically “bad” for all time. As with all emotional extremes, if you have passionate love for something the opposite can also happen, passionate hate. “Oh look at those cute fuzzy bunnies, oh I just wuv you to death. Those bad meanies want to hurt you so I really hate them!” Hence the projection, since in their world they easily get into the love/hate modality, if you don’t agree with X, which means you’re not passionate in-love with it, well then you must hate it. “I wuv blacks, and I’m going to give them all this candy, oh they’ll just eat it up. Candy doesn’t give them cavities, you must hate blacks, you bad man!” The result: tantrums, name-calling, twisted and inane “logic”, and often the refrain of “I hate you!”.Lastly you get the simplification of the child. If you were to explain why it’s good to eat broccoli because of the health benefits or it will lead to better eating habits in the long-run, it’s not going to be understood. So you tend to give quick and simple answers. “Because I said so.” “There are starving children in China.” At some point though children are supposed to develop reasoning abilities that allow them to get past that. However if that reasoning ability is suppressed, you remain in “sound-bite” mode. “Bush lied people died!” “No blood for oil!” “I know you are but what am I?” etc. This last part alone I think could be clissifaed as a learning disability, and pretty much a purposeful malpractice on children in general. If it was the sole problem it could be corrected, but unfortunately we have an ideology that’s modus operendi is to not only enforce this lack of reasoning, but also inflict infantilizing its constituency. An enforced child philosophy as public policy. How to overcome it. Well unfortunately the Republican party has had a dalliance with this philosophy, mostly the “try to be friends with your child” attitude that allows their kids to do sex and drugs without responsibility. “We need to cross the aisle, be friends, bosom buddies, bi-partisan, all the world will love us then”. Yeah, that’s worked for 50 years now. So now the house is a mess, the kids are running around screaming and making trouble, the neighbors are complaining, and the parents are hiding in the basement. It’s now time to say No. The child needs to have a time-out. The adults need to clean up and restore sanity. WWBD? What Would Breitbart Do?





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Leiila

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 16:56:40

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 310 time(s).