Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'And the bad news is you won't be able to kick robwood in the nuts for a while? (N/T)' posted by NovaFlash - 01/11/2008, 10:17:57
'now THAT'S bad news... (N/T)' posted by littlestar - 01/11/2008, 21:05:51
'Yes.. I strike fear into your hearts, don't I.. (N/T)' posted by NovaHitchcock - 02/11/2008, 05:04:43

CURRENT MESSAGE

Firstly, the people
Firstly, the people who start coiprnsacy theories almost always have a political axe to grind against another political faction. This is almost always a preexisting condition. The coiprnsacy theorist will always be looking on how to exploit some indiscrepancies in largely accepted facts. They will then use numerous abnormalities to formulate their theory which will support their underlying political beliefs. The theory must start with a few abnormalities but after those abnormalities the theory must take on a believable course of action. Once people take that first abnormality as proof of a larger coiprnsacy, they will begin to believe everything … up to a point. A coiprnsacy is not too hard to believe given historical evidence, e.g. Japan blowing up a railway line in an excuse to invade China in WWII. However, the believer of the theory doesn’t want to understand that these historical evidences are quiet different then the modern world, in their eyes, nothing has changed. To build a strong theory, stronger scientific evidence must exist for the theory to be truly believable, although the theorist already believes it. The theorist will gather scientific (hard) evidence from sources that are already biased toward their beliefs. They will also find the few sketchy ‘eye-witness’ accounts of any kind of evidence that can support their theory. It should be noted that ‘eye-witness’ accounts are usually unreliable due to: belief bias, not remembering things correctly in the heat of the moment, fear, etc. The coiprnsacy theory is ready to fly if the following are satisfied: Does it make sense? Is it plausible? Is there a means, motive and opportunity available at every stage? Is there enough evidence to support the theory? Most importantly, does the coiprnsacy theory actually explain what happened? Even now after so much bending of the truth, all that exists is circumstantial evidence that wouldn’t stand up in any legitimate court. The theorist will now release their theory via book, documentary, website (blog), and interviews on mass media that directs interested parties to the book, documentary, or website.Secondly, this smaller above mentioned coiprnsacy theory (e.g. 9/11), is almost always connected to a larger coiprnsacy theory (e.g. NWO). Both the smaller and larger coiprnsacy theory is facilitated by the federal government, large corporations, and the military. These three organizations are controlled by an Illuminati or “Enlighted” people. The Illuminati are one or a combination of the following: Socialists, Conservatives, Rich People, Fascists, Freemasons, Jews, Skull and Bones, Catholics, Bilderbergs, Morons, a Super Computer, Cyborgs from the Future, Aliens, or the Devil and his Followers. These Illuminati have the intent on creating a New World Order, which is pretty much the largest coiprnsacy that could possibly exist. Conspiracy theories attract those people who are looking for the competitive advantage of intelligence/the truth, albeit non-existent, to make up for some other sort falling of theirs. Those that create conspiracies either: want to service a political objective by creating fear and division amongst their rivals, feel important or smarter or “enlightened” themselves, or they just dislike those that they are accusing . They almost always believe their own myth. If facts are used to debunk the theory, the theorist will simply say that the debunker is naive or unenlightened. Little consideration is taken to the realistic problems of an actual coiprnsacy like the number one killer of a real coiprnsacy: a leak. Unless the events happened in a controlled society (e.g. North Korea), any real coiprnsacy involving a large organizational body is quickly whistleblowed by someone inside the organization. This is especially true of either politically charged events like 9/11, or events involving large institutions that employ people with a myriad of beliefs, agendas, and ideologies. Many American conspiracies centralize around distrust of the federal government, shows like the X-files don’t help.The more society believes in coiprnsacy theories, the more easy it is for future coiprnsacy theories to come to fruition, and the crazier they will get. I fear that society’s line between reality and stupidity is becoming ever blurrier.Conspiracy theories slowly fade away when the events no longer apply to present political circumstances and/or when the people that created them and believed in them grow old and die.





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Dare

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 15:38:51

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 221 time(s).