Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'A hamster? No wait, I know. A rabbit! (N/T)' posted by Selma - 07/05/2010, 20:29:48
'Actually, a bunny... (N/T)' posted by NovaFlash - 07/05/2010, 21:35:20
'Suicidal bunny?  (N/T)' posted by Selma - 08/05/2010, 03:41:23

CURRENT MESSAGE

Spending Cuts.. Spe
Spending Cuts.. Spending Cuts.. Spending Cuts. If we did cut everything we could who and where would ALL of the sanivgs be applied. Who would gain the benefit of surplus.Oh Wait! We did have a surplus when jr. took office didnt we? So why then or who did THAT surplus benefit? Did the baggers see any of that? How did that surplus benefit future generations and their children? You know the ones they are always talking about.I really dont understand who these baggers think will reap the most benefit from a balanced budget. THEM??The Govt is not in the business of saving money, it just isnt their job. Saving money for what?A rainy day? The pentagon? One thing for sure the baggers wont get any of it, so why the big push?Why are social programs somehow compared to feeding deer in the backyard, to be looked down on as govt handouts? Yet handing $billions and $billions to the corporations is just fine?President Carter gets bad press all the time, but, he did balance his budget twice (2)So are these the same baggers complaining about Carter's austerity programs as ruining the economy?





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Rendi

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 15:16:19

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 323 time(s).