Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'do you *have* a million dollars just to bury for some potentially future event.....' posted by Little green man - 21/12/2009, 15:38:19
'It won't be buried.' posted by Robwood - 21/12/2009, 16:43:06
'Military pay's better for your lot than ours!' posted by Miguel - 21/12/2009, 19:49:23

CURRENT MESSAGE

Roger.Thanks for the
Roger.Thanks for the link to your article. I had in fact read it beofre, and I remember nodding my head in agreement with what you had to say. But now we have another question. If the Australian emissions targets are so obviously unreachable, why would a (presumably) pragmatic politician like Julia Gillard act as if they aren't? Is she blinded by crusading zeal, or getting bad advice from her advisers, or both? She surely can't seriously believe that cutting Australian carbon emissions by 25% by 2020 will have any significant impact on droughts or bush fires. Or maybe she does .... Whenever I read about proposed emissions caps I'm constantly reminded of the fact that there is only one case where a group of countries has ever succeeded in cutting emissions by anything more than a token amount - Russia and the other East Bloc states in the 1990s. And they did it not by design, but by collapsing economically. Maybe some politicians need to be reminded of this from time to time too.





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Hanifa

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 15:08:46

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
186.88.225.1




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 246 time(s).