Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'Sevilian Board index page
'Muffy I dreamt about you' posted by Selma - 30/04/2009, 05:10:58
'Whatever. You know you want me. (o:Þ (N/T)' posted by Robwood - 02/05/2009, 09:06:23

CURRENT MESSAGE

Ok, from your link:
Ok, from your link: So-called right to work laws undermine coivlctele bargaining by allowing some employees to free ride when the union uses the coivlctele power of workers to negotiate wages, raises, and other benefits with managers. Under right to work laws, employees can get these benefits while opting-out of paying the costs, which groups like FreedomWorks have spun as workplace freedom. It fails to mention that this only applies if the union CHOOSES to negotiate for exclusive representation and denies non members their ability to negotiate for themselves. Notice how they avoid mentioning that the unions can get a members only agreement, if they wanted to, and avoid the free riders? Again, free riders' are a result of union management not wanting non members to be able to negotiate on their own. It's a form of forced membership. So much for that democratic enterprise.So your source bases its premise on a flat out lie. Therefore it's useless propaganda. Unless you can point to a law that prevents member only representation? But you won't. . One doesn't exist or we would have heard about it. The unions would have fought it in court. The Supreme Court has upheld member only negotiations multiple times. Free rider issue debunked. It's your union bosses lying to you and you buying it hook line and sinker.





(VISITOR) AUTHOR'S NAME
Seferov

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
16 december 2014, 13:30:06

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
62.210.78.179




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

- no replies yet -



REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 221 time(s).