Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
PREVIOUS MESSAGE(S)
'Did you actually read the article?' posted by Symo - 29/03/2010, 14:00:13
'Did you?' posted by Robwood - 29/03/2010, 22:43:30
'What makes you assume I did not?' posted by Symo - 30/03/2010, 01:17:38

CURRENT MESSAGE

Because you're still not seeing it.
previously posted:


previously posted:
Let see...person, check...skin check...

Brown skin..uncheck...


previously posted:
Now i'm not sure if you mean this one:


I do.


previously posted:
but i hope not, cuase that would mean that the next one you mean is:


previously posted:
Now what about these proves your point?


All of them.

previously posted:
(You do agree that skin tone is in the yellow/orange spectrum don't you?)

Not always, as demonstrated above. The second photo the guy's too pale to fit in the orange scheme the poster was trying to lay out and as for the third...what skin tone? There's nothing there but black and blue. I'm not saying the guy has an invalid argument, I just think he needed to come up with better examples.






AUTHOR OF THIS MESSAGE
Robwood

MESSAGE TIMESTAMP
30 march 2010, 01:40:22

AUTHOR'S IP LOGGED
75.242.89.55




REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE

blank
In Conclusion: - Symo - 30/03/2010, 13:23:46terminator
blank
I got deeppink. I do - Anita - 16/12/2014, 16:25:45terminator
blank
My monitor must be colourblind - NovaFlash - 30/03/2010, 02:28:20terminator
blank
Thank you so much fo - Takis - 19/12/2014, 00:44:48terminator
blank
   October 31, 2011T - Christina - 16/12/2014, 12:45:40terminator
blank
But where is the fun in that?! - Symo - 30/03/2010, 13:18:13terminator
blank
PS. This is as long  - Fani - 19/12/2014, 05:26:24terminator
blank
I visited a lot of w - Atalay - 16/12/2014, 13:32:40terminator


REPLY FORM

name:
email:
title:
message:
Please type the text of the image below into the text box here to confirm that you are human, before posting a comment:

  sign post using your signature    |      no text
    
Index Page | Login Page | Registration Page
















message was viewed 799 time(s).